That is extra a rant than anything, and a bit faraway from the discussion of hiking, and hiking clothes for ladies. Sure I might love to begin a clothing company of my very own which would even have it’s own “social mission” so to talk. Clothes companies goals are making a living by concentrating on ladies. In the process the vast majority of clothing corporations make the world worse for ladies. It's as if it is an agenda towards ladies. In all probability most women’s kinds are designed and conceptualized by men from the drawing board to the ultimate sewing together of the apparel item. The few ladies who are in the women’s clothing design trade apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a development towards better clothing designs for girls who want practicality, dignity and function of their clothes. And that is where the dilemma comes in for lots of girls who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Women who just need practical, comfortable clothes are truly underrepresented . Positive, lots of people would say “Not so. Since loads of low-rise or pores and skin-tight denims, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-quick skirts are the kind of clothes that most likely nearly all of ladies purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothing) , then it means these are the kinds that will proceed to be manufactured and moreover these kinds of “feminine styles” will make their way into all kinds of women’s clothes, even those which might be imagined to be for function not fashion. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so on. It isn't the only clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates style into function. It brings us back to where we began. As fairly just a few girls who posted right here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothing for better fit, higher consolation, higher freedom of motion and better sturdiness. I'd say that basically unisex sizing is the best way to go along with some features that will help accommodate people who may need a bit more hip or belly (each women and men). The vast majority of women’s “active wear” just don’t have it. ’s clothes. Men’s sizes are larger even in terms of “small” sizes for men. I doubt this is unattainable. In general, girls can match into men’s clothing this fashion. The scrubs have been offered by the power. I just lately was working in a analysis facility and was required to wear scrubs. I advised her that when it comes to scrubs, a size small pant does not fit me and it's strange because most small-measurement men’s pants fit me. The provision individual said she thought a measurement small would match me. The supply individual said that it's as a result of ladies have hips and males don’t. I told her that it seems that numerous small-sized men would find it exhausting to fit in most small-sized scrubs too. What lots of people appear to forget is that some men do have pretty-prominent hips and the vast majority of men’s clothes are meant for males with completely straight hips. In actual fact when men get older, in their 40s they very often develop bigger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio commercial for a particular sort of Levis denims which have been meant for older males and it was said that the options had extra room in the hip and thigh. Yet males have a greater deal in relation to clothes. Women’s clothes is at all times made to incorporate trend somewhat than function. EMS and REI and Sierra Buying and selling Put up, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and various other such shops, or on-line shops have a few of the better kinds of clothes meant for hiking and other outdoor actions. Manufacturers resembling Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and varied others. These manufacturers are inclined to have the absolute best materials, and the perfect features. They have one of the best mixture of fabrics so as to be lightweight as possible for sizzling days and which can protect in chilly days without a number of bulk. They are inclined to have SPF inbuilt to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to use a large measurement to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the part of the jacket that was below the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to put on and simply had a really awkward look to it. But, I have seen such absurdly-reduce jackets for ladies by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to boost the feminine form whereas being “useful” for outside exercise, or that is what the designers had in thoughts and yet I should wonder what they had been pondering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and restricting once i moved. I don’t know how it ever received manufactured and doubtless hundreds have been made and it appeared to be a waste of time and supplies and it appeared as if the “quality management people” missed some major design flaws. I want I wrote down the model number in order that maybe I could discover a link to it within the web and perhaps you all can see for your self. There are other women’s lively wear that will not be as excessive however which still have sufficient lack of perform so that most lively ladies just can't use them. The Gap and Outdated Navy will not be notably for lively wear however they've small line of such clothes. I think that they're awful in materials and design. The Hole, Old Navy, Modell’s, Target, K-Mart and different such stores, basically only have clothes product of cotton ( with just a few exceptions). Modell’s is supposed to be a “sports store” nevertheless it carries train clothes for ladies which is made by Nike, Addidas (and many others) and although these are nicely-identified brand names, I discover that they actually put a lot style into clothing on the expense of function. They went out of business years in the past however they also had clothing for girls that I found to be impractically designed. In New York City the place I reside there is one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-effectively-identified retailer in decrease Manhattan which sells all kinds of out of doors/camping/hiking tools and clothing. There was once a retailer in NYC referred to as Herman’s and another called Robbin’s. Far from it. I have seen ladies in these shops speaking to gross sales associates and saying that they've regarded in all places for more practical designs . There may be an organization that plenty of you probably have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s active wear. There are various Modell’s and one Sports activities Authority, and a few Old Navy’s and It would seem that there are a variety of shops that will have one thing for every lady. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The vast majority of their types are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” while taking part in sports activities or partaking in rugged outside actions. Why do I all the time notice that the clothes that come the closest to being useful and rugged and sensible are the ones which might be discontinued and replaced by those who aren’t? Their women’s bathing fits are really ineffective. They're meant for women who've perfect figures , even who're professional fashions and the bathing suits are sexist in my opinion. They could proceed a sure type for several seasons or they might exchange the fashion and by no means revive it. Why ought to any bathing suit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the top be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain sorts of designs referred to as “Grab and Go” meaning that the clothes are so virtually designed you could simply grab them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to exercise or do anything else. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as marketed to be. All through my life I have gone from retailer to retailer during certain times of the 12 months looking for the most effective rugged and purposeful clothes for winter or summer time. It is at all times arduous to seek out something close to what I need. It typically goes for footwear and slippers and different footwear too. I usually have to take whatever comes closest and that is normally in the men’s section. There are designs which I will go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they had been made the way in which they have been.. I once found some snug slip-ons made by Teva. But the absurd factor was that the soles have been designed with fairly-deep grooves that have been very carefully spaced and so they had been throughout the only . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They are the principle piece of clothes that will probably be touching the ground and going by means of all kinds of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing footwear which can be meant to be cleaned and are straightforward to wash. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To enable climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it does not work on any form of foot wear like it really works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes producer noticed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so on) get caught within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires implies that a lot of the debris might be hurled off. No human can create that form of physical pressure to continually pressure the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The best way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles hard to clean. It implies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots might be stuffed up with debris and wouldn't help much in serving to the wearer to effectively climb; that is that if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are literally meant to enable the wearer to climb. It appears to me that if the soles are made from rubber there isn’t a necessity for such elaborately designed grooves that solely acquire dirt. I wonder why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians engaged on a better sort of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking footwear are used, and it would make it pointless to make grooves on the soles of shoes. I have seen some unusual designs that do not contribute to function. It appears to me that grooves are just put on the soles of sneakers for style purposes. This goes for sneakers too. Plenty of sneakers which could be good in design in other ways, have very impractically designed soles. So far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and other such sorts of pants, there are these which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are these with drawstrings. After all I am not an knowledgeable in making shoes or shoe-soles and that i might be improper , however I'm sufficient of an knowledgeable in sporting sneakers meant for lively lifestyles and I feel that a lot of shoe manufacturers are specializing in the mistaken factor. I'm wondering why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist area. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I believe it makes the drawstring less efficient and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in stores equivalent to Okay-Mart and Target where there are a large number of women’s underwear. It is difficult to search out the form of briefs that most of our grandmothers used to put on, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my view. I choose comfort, durability and easy-care. All that doesn't speak for me. Anything that will get caught you-know-the place is unacceptable. I have been within the underwear section of department shops and other shops (I must admit I by no means seemed in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t expect to search out something practical there), and I have seen older girls looking for something that is age-acceptable and dignified and , again, sensible. There may be little aside leggings sports bra set from those hi-cuts. See one of many hyperlinks below for an article concerning the historical past of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” should not modest sufficient. It appears it has all the time been about bodily limiting women. That’s the best way I take a look at it. Additionally one of the hyperlinks beneath result in an article about how there shall be a women’s like of clothes which shall be inspired by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It signifies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have found to what I prefer is a sure Jockey brand transient “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the higher form of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be less rugged and the stitching can come undone extra simply . I need to order a dimension larger than I usually would in order that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One major flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the true function of “athletic bras” the way they are designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I actually don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for active lifestyles should hold them in, nothing more. I have heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I've seen some feminine runners who seem like prime heavy and still they're very quick but I'm wondering if they'll develop back issues later in life. I know that I will not be addressing the needs of girls born with certain sizes, or who have particular needs similar to after surgical procedure, however sport bras should be made to have sufficient comfortable tension to stop bouncing. There may be a need for bras that do what some jock straps are presupposed to do. I want to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the appropriate space that would make bras unnecessary. It could be fantastic for warmer weather and for simplicity, so you don’t must hassle with attaching a bra and then a shirt. Simply keep “them” from shifting. Just slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you may go out to stroll , jog or no matter. Why isn’t there such a thing? I believe I mentioned in one among my previous posts that Coolibar had a reasonably good pant for ladies referred to as Sun Pant. I'm sure a number of women would want such forms of clothes. I then put in an elastic band to supply extra tension for the reason that waist band could be a bit too massive in any other case, and the pant is practically a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved slicing into the again of the waistband area since the drawstring was sewn into that area. It is very sensible for lots of activities. It isn't so long that the hem drags on the floor. It is not for very very hot weather but that may depend on your own capacity to tolerate scorching weather. It's of a cloth blend that's not like cotton. All pants should have pockets, however sometimes the way in which the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I find it's a really individual factor. This is how most hiking pants should be designed. It is a teensy bit too dense for very popular weather very very similar to the original Coolibar Solar Pant. It is supposed for use with a belt but I discover that I don’t need one to put on this pant. I discovered a pant on Cabela’s that's for men, however which fits properly and it's named “The utility Pant” (see one of the last two hyperlinks under). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight if you bend or transfer. In fact not everyone has the same figure as I accomplish that others might need a distinct opinion. But typically this is a good kind of pant . In the event you do like it you need to write to the company and inform them to hang on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so because the openings are slits almost fully parallel with the waist. I think they are going to discontinue it so that you might want to provide it a attempt. The material stretches so it isn't as unhealthy as if it had been with denims with these kinds of pockets. It is an impractical design and that i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets it's important to maneuver your hands in a more unnatural approach and even elevate the hem of your shirt to place your palms in your front pants pockets. It must be for model, nothing else. Pockets ought to be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It's a good idea to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too close will know what I imply. But typically zippers may cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you place your hands in. There's a need to design zippers of non-scraping materials for this goal. There is also another men’s pant from Columbia. I think I discussed them before (see considered one of the two links under). Why aren’t any clothing designers working on this? They are of a great material for hot days, however for me, I discovered myself eradicating the belt and sewing an elastic band in the back of the waistband area so as to make the belt pointless. I ride a bike. I not often use shorts even once i jog. However again, I should settle for whatever comes near what I want. I came across a running brief referred to as Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to simply go to clothes stores to take a look at designs and materials . What I did like about it was the lightweight material. I just wondered why regular lengthy pants should not product of such a material. It would be wonderful for a hiking pant meant for extremely popular weather. The material was very much like a very very lightweight softshell. There is one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I love softshell clothes. It is vitally lightweight, not very good for chilly weather by itself but you possibly can put layering underneath it. It is flexible and suits excellently and permits freedom of motion. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer time. Also , why aren’t there any actually really virtually-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an excellent summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I discover myself wishing for such a thing. It doesn't exist. Why not make one in every of lightweight and stretchy material? I do know that I've stated to much in this post. I'll cease for now. I hope I didn't bore anyone. I've lots of ideas for the better design of clothes and I will in all probability submit once more with
